The Corporate File

Why Being 100% Compliant Is Becoming a 100% Governance Risk

---

A director sits on 10 committees.
Chairs 5.

Every rule is followed.
Every disclosure is clean.

And yet—
institutional investors may still vote against their reappointment.

This is not a contradiction.
This is modern governance.

---

⚖️ The Legal Position — And Its Blind Spot

Under Regulation 26(1) of the SEBI LODR Regulations:

• Up to 10 committee memberships
• Up to 5 chairpersonships
• Only:
  • Audit Committee
  • Stakeholders’ Relationship Committee
    are counted

Everything else—Risk, ESG, Strategy, Technology—does not count.

---

📊 The Reality: Governance Has Expanded

Boards today operate through far more than two committees:

• ESG & Sustainability
• Technology & AI
• Risk & Cybersecurity
• Strategy & Capital Allocation
• Project Oversight

👉 Regulation counts 2 committees
👉 Governance runs on 10+

That gap is the problem.

---

🧠 The Missing Metric: Human Bandwidth

One committee typically means:

• ~250 pages of pre-read
• 4–6 meetings a year
• 3–5 hours per meeting
• Continuous follow-ups

👉 ~120 hours annually per committee

At the legal limit:

👉 ~1,200 hours/year

That’s ~60% of a full-time role—
before board meetings, crises, or investor interactions.

At this point, the director isn’t governing.
They are managing overload.

---

👀 Why Proxy Advisors Cut It to 6

Firms like:

• Stakeholders Empowerment Services
• Institutional Shareholder Services
• Glass Lewis

recommend:

• 6 memberships
• 3 chairpersonships

Not because of law—
but because of capacity.

---

🔍 The Real Test

Law asks:

“Is it allowed?”

Proxy asks:

“Can it be done well?”

And increasingly—
investors are siding with proxy.

---

🤖 The 2026 Shift: Investors Are Watching Differently

Institutional investors like:

• BlackRock
• Vanguard

now use AI-driven models to flag:

• Overboarded directors
• Engagement gaps
• Committee overload

The question has changed:

Not “Are you compliant?”
But “Are you overstretched?”

---

👑 The Chairperson Illusion

Regulation allows 5 chairpersonships.
Proxy caps it at 3.

Because a Chair must:

• Drive agenda
• Challenge management
• Lead in crises

👉 Beyond 3, leadership becomes symbolic—not functional.

---

📉 What Overboarding Actually Does

• Depth collapses → reading becomes scanning
• Questions reduce → challenge becomes compliance
• Committees become rituals → governance weakens
• Risk becomes invisible → until failure

---

🔥 The Core Insight

This is not about too many committees.

It is about this:

Governance has scaled. Human attention has not.

---

🎯 What Boards Must Change

Stop counting positions.
Start measuring capacity.

Old question:
How many committees does a director sit on?

Better question:
How many hours of real governance can they sustain?

---

🧾 A Simple Board Filter

Before appointing a director, ask:

• Total committee load?
• Chairperson roles?
• Estimated annual hours?

👉 If it exceeds ~800–1,000 hours/year:

You don’t have an experienced director.
You have an overextended one.

---

⚖️ Final Thought

The law sets the ceiling.
Proxy sets the warning.

But governance is defined by something simpler:

Attention.

---

And today’s biggest risk?

Fully compliant directors—
with no bandwidth left to govern.

 Disclaimer: This content is fictional and intended solely for creative expression. Any resemblance to real companies, organizations, or individuals is purely coincidental and unintended. The creator disclaims any liability arising from such resemblance. Prepared solely for academic and educational purposes. This does not constitute investment advice, professional consultation, or any recommendation

Connect on Linkedin www.linkedin.com/in/smita-hegde-90595b1b5

• LinkedIn